The Devil and the Nun

Posted by Censor Librorum on Mar 7, 2020 | Categories: Arts & Letters, Fishy Fridays, History, Scandals, Sex

On the morning of August 11, 1676, a young nun named Maria was found on the floor of her cell.  Her face was smeared with ink.  Her hand held a sheet of paper covered with inscrutable glyphs.  She told the other nuns that the Devil appeared to her in the night and tried to turn her away from her faith. To persuade Maria, the Devil took over her facilities and wrote a letter with her hand.  The writing was not in Latin or any familiar language. It was a mysterious jumble of occult symbols and archaic letters.  No one was able to decipher the letter by the Devil. 

Sister Maria Crocifissa della Concezione was 15 years old when she entered the Benedictine convent in Palma di Montechiaro, Sicily. She was 31 at the time of the Devil’s visit.  Maria had a history of struggling against the Devil.  She would scream at him at night. In the convent’s chapel, she would shriek and lose consciousness.  She was convinced that Satan was trying to turn her towards evil.

In 2017, director Daniel Abate and a research team from the Ludum science center in Catania, Sicily cracked the code.  They used an algorithm found on the Deep Web. “We heard about the software,” Abate said, “which is used by intelligence services for coding breaking. We primed the software with ancient Greek, Arabic, the Runic alphabet and Latin to descramble some of the letter.”  The team was eventually able to translate 15 lines, which were certainly devilish for a nun to express:

“Humans are responsible for the creation of God.”

“This system works for no one.”

“God thinks he can free mortals.”

“Perhaps now, Styx is certain.”

“God and Jesus are dead weights.

“We speculated that Sister Maria created a new vocabulary using ancient alphabets that she may have known,” Abate said. “This is a precise alphabet, invented by the nun with great care by mixing symbols that she knew. We analyzed how the syllables and graphisms (or thoughts depicted as symbols) repeated in the letter in order to locate vowels, and we ended up with a refined decryption algorithm.”  Abate thought Sister Maria had a good command of languages, which allowed her to invent the code.  There is no information on what happened to her after the incident.

The letter was an elaborate hoax by Sister Maria. Why did she do it? How was she sure that she would not be found out? If she knew ancient alphabets, didn’t any of the other nuns at her convent know them as well? Abate believes the nun had schizophrenia, which made her imagine dialogues with the Devil.

Here’s my guess across 344 years:  She was frustrated, pent-up, tormented by sexual desires or guilt. She had some doubts about the faith, which bothered her.  Her small stage as a woman and as a nun bothered her. She was conflicted, she wanted attention, and she acted out her doubts and obsessions. The Devil was a good prop.  Once she started with the screams and convulsions, she had to keep it up.  She probably wanted to keep it up; the letter was a good finale.  She won her fight against Satan and became a heroine in the convent.

Sister Maria most likely heard about other demonic possessions and Satanic letters in other convents.  The 17th century was full of them, all featuring young nuns tempted by sex and heresy including Aix-en-Provence in 1611; Lille in 1613, Loudon in 1634 and Louviers in 1647. They are full of real and imagined seductions by priests and other nuns. I am surprised that no one has thought to do a full-blown historical and psychological study on these possessions, and their links with sex, female rebellion, and church politics.




Bookmark and Share

7 Responses to “The Devil and the Nun”

  1. Tom Says:

    You said they translated 15 lines but you only put 5! I’ve looked at a bunch of articles on the internet and NONE OF THEM HAVE THE FULL TRANSLATION! What is wrong with everyone? Why can’t someone show a photo of the note with the translation process? DETAILS PLEASE!

  2. Karen Says:

    Tom, I included the translation the researchers released. Each phrase does not constitute one line! The nun wrote in runes, hieroglyphs and in different languages hundreds of years old. The translation to modern Italian or English is not a perfect line by line match. I suggest you write to the researchers and ask them for more detail, if you think there is more that they haven’t shared on the web.

  3. Michael Says:

    Someone knows what the translation means and it’s the people’s RIGHT to know. I encourage those who are in the know to share all.

  4. Gary Says:

    So your telling me a monostary of nuns teachesancient runic. Greek I can see but your telling me this woman knew ancient egyptian and runic that’s bull. Greek is Catholic not the others. Seems more legit them other demonic cases I’ve heard of. Mind you Egypt was still covered in sand during that time let alone fully decoded.

  5. John Says:

    Sources say Sister Maria was surrounded by 15 pages of this letter, and if 70% of it has been translated, where is it? It would certainly be more than these 5 lines, but I cant seem to find the full letter, translated or untranslated, anywhere.

  6. Nico Says:

    Gary, since when is the Greek language a catholic language? What is a catholic language. Greek is a Indo- European language which uses letters created before Christianity existed. Even a Latin language wouldn’t be Catholic or Christian as they spoke it in ancient Rome. The only Christian language is the still non commonly translated one used to make it harder to understand the Bible. There is no Christian language. Also her being a linguist she could of known demonic especially if she knew any ancient Greek language and could of had knowledge of even older Egyptian there wasn’t just hieroglyphs they had a written language as well but especially modern greek or dimotiki and Egyptian she could of learned from a book she was a linguist probably transcribing the Bible into other languages.

  7. Gregory Says:

    Given the year in which this occurred, it stretches credibility to imagine that a Sicilian woman of common birth would have access to the reading material required to command a strong enough knowledge of the languages in question to form a code….let alone a conversant message. Great story….thanks for sharing

Leave a Reply